Re: surf.m overwrites "facecolor" property

[dbateman]

John W. Eaton wrote:
> 
> On 10-Dec-2007, John W. Eaton wrote:
> 
> | On  6-Dec-2007, Michael Goffioul wrote:
> | 
> | | Why does surf.m overwrite "facecolor" property of the generated
> surface?
> | | This property should be "flat" by default for surface object. Setting
> it
> | | explicitely makes it impossible to call surf like:
> | | 
> | | surf(peaks, "facecolor", "r");
> | 
> | Removing the
> | 
> |   "facecolor", "flat"
> | 
> | args from the call to __go_surface__ in surface.m doesn't seem to be
> | enough to make your example work properly.  I could use some help here
> | as I don't fully understand the way surface plotting is supposed to
> | work.
> 
> Oh, now I see this message:
> 
>  
> https://www.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/octave-maintainers/2007-December/005189.html
> 
> which is I think related.  If fixing this is difficult, then I'd say
> we skip it for 3.0.
> 
> jwe
> 
> 

I think we should forget it for 3.0. It on my list of things to fix..

D.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/surf.m-overwrites-%22facecolor%22-property-tp14189666p14269388.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.