[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.9.19??
From: |
Tatsuro MATSUOKA |
Subject: |
Re: 2.9.19?? |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Dec 2007 19:37:34 +0900 (JST) |
Hello
Jwe Wrote
Octave sends the "set palette" command if it thinks it is using
gnuplot 4.1 or later. What does the __gnuplot_version__ function
report in each of the two cases? What does
compare_versions (__gnuplot_version__ (), "4.0", ">")
return?
octave.exe:1> compare_versions (__gnuplot_version__ (), "4.0", ">")
ans = 1
octave.exe:2> __gnuplot_version__
ans = 4.3
--- Michael Goffioul <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 12/11/07, Tatsuro MATSUOKA <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Anyway Michael's gnuplot goes well, this is a trivial issue but I wonder
> > why.
>
> Probably because the way pgnuplot and wgnuplot communicate together
> is not suited for binary data.
OK!
I think that Michael's opnion is right.
The original pgnuplot just send data
in a byte unit wgnuplot windows by Win32 API.
This seems to the gnuplot problem.
I'll go to the gnuplot ML.
Thanks to John and Michael.
Tatsuro
--------------------------------------
New Design Yahoo! JAPAN 2008/01/01
http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/newdesign/
- Re: 2.9.19??, (continued)
- Re: 2.9.19??, Ben Abbott, 2007/12/09
- 2.9.19??, John W. Eaton, 2007/12/10
- Re: 2.9.19??, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2007/12/10
- Re: 2.9.19??, Michael Goffioul, 2007/12/10
- Re: 2.9.19??, David Bateman, 2007/12/10
- Re: 2.9.19??, John W. Eaton, 2007/12/10
- Re: 2.9.19??, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2007/12/10
- Re: 2.9.19??, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2007/12/10
- Re: 2.9.19??, John W. Eaton, 2007/12/11
- Re: 2.9.19??, Michael Goffioul, 2007/12/11
- Re: 2.9.19??,
Tatsuro MATSUOKA <=
- Re: 2.9.19??, Michael Goffioul, 2007/12/11
- Re: 2.9.19??, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2007/12/11
- Re: 2.9.19??, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2007/12/10
2.9.19??, John W. Eaton, 2007/12/11