octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 3.0 when?


From: John W. Eaton
Subject: Re: 3.0 when?
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:01:36 -0500

On 18-Dec-2007, Michael Goffioul wrote:

| On 12/18/07, Tatsuro MATSUOKA <address@hidden> wrote:
| > Hello Benjamin
| >
| > Benjamin wrote
| > > I would vote for moving edit.m from the forge package to octave core
| > > functions.
| > > Argument is similar to the imread/imwrite topic. Why should I first
| > > install a package to be able to conveniently invoke an editor.
| > >
| > > It would also allow easier use of a packaged editor with the mingw 
binaries.
| >
| > That's a good idea!!
| > I also vote for moving edit.m from the forge package to octave core 
functions.
| 
| Why not also package octave-forge in the mingw binaries?

I think it would be best if the standalone Windows distributions were
essentially the same except for the choice of compiler.  Would it be
difficult to make that happen?

jwe


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]