octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 3.0 when?


From: Tatsuro MATSUOKA
Subject: Re: 3.0 when?
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 08:04:25 +0900 (JST)

Hello Benjamin

cc. John

I understand your idea.
I am now preparing the Octave-Forge packages for my mingw distribution.
I will bundle extra libraries and header files to build Octave-Forge packages.

I would like add instruction page to build Octave-forge package when your 3.0.0 
will be realsed.

That might be a realistic solution.

Regards

Tatsuro


--- Benjamin Lindner <address@hidden> wrote:

> > Hello Benjamin
> > 
> > Perhaps you aware that I have forgotten to talk about the octcdf, which 
> > requires the netcdf.
> > 
> 
> Yes I know that there are some packages that have additional external 
> dependencies.
> I have not checked for *every* forge package to install on-the-fly.
> Since dependency building is the bigger task on win32 the packages with 
> external deps simply had lower priority.
> 
> Frankly, if a forge package building-and-installation exceeds a certain 
> degree of complexity and makes it very tidysome to do for the average 
> user in a win32 machine then I'll not put infinitly much effort into it.
> If it doesn't work, it doesn't work.
> If one wants a smooth (and IMO in many aspects better) system, I suggest 
> a switch to one of the various *nix distros.
> Of course there are those who have no choice (like me), and here a 
> working win32 octave is a *big* relief :)
> Forge Packages are a very nice bonus, but I do not use all of them and 
> thus had not checked for all of them to work.
> 
> do it step by step.
> 
> benjamin
> 
> 


--------------------------------------
Easy + Joy + Powerful = Yahoo! Bookmarks x Toolbar
http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/toolbar/


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]