Re: Many Date Functions

[John W. Eaton]

On 29-Jan-2008, Bill Denney wrote:

| Bill Denney wrote:
| > Attached are many date functions and a diff that updates a few of the 
| > current date functions.  I'm separating them into several messages 
| > which will be replies to this one because I had trouble sending 
| > everything in one message.
| More date functions.

I think these functions could be useful, but I'm not sure that they
belong in the core Octave distribution.  Perhaps a better place for
them would be a separate date/time package?  What do other people
think?

If they go in a separate package, then the copyright notice should be
changed from "This file is part of Octave" and other instances of
"Octave" in the copyright notice should be replace with "this
software".

Thanks,

jwe