[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Polyfit with scaling
From: |
Ben Abbott |
Subject: |
Re: Polyfit with scaling |
Date: |
Fri, 1 Feb 2008 14:12:14 -0500 |
On Feb 1, 2008, at 9:15 AM, Ben Abbott wrote:
On Jan 31, 2008, at 9:26 PM, Ben Abbott wrote:
I should mention that nothing has been done to ensure that the
second output respects the normalization of the dependent variable.
I'll look into what needs to be done there, if it is possible ... or
more to the point, if I'm up to the task ;-)
If anyone has experience or background in how the job might be done,
please feel free to contribute or to point me in the right direction!
Ben
I've added some code to mock the 2nd output, and have fixed a bug.
In this version, the Cholesky factor and the Vandermonde matrix which
are returned as fields on the 2nd output are not used in the
solution. The matrices that are used are representative of the scaled
version of x.
While this is not a pretty solution, I don't know what else might be
done. Any thoughts?
Ben
polyscale.m
Description: Binary data
polyshift.m
Description: Binary data
polyfit.m
Description: Binary data
- Re: Polyfit with scaling, Ben Abbott, 2008/02/01
- Re: Polyfit with scaling,
Ben Abbott <=
- Re: Polyfit with scaling, Ben Abbott, 2008/02/02
- Re: Polyfit with scaling, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2008/02/02
- Re: Polyfit with scaling, Ben Abbott, 2008/02/02
- Re: Polyfit with scaling, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2008/02/02
- Re: Polyfit with scaling, Ben Abbott, 2008/02/02
- Re: Polyfit with scaling, Ben Abbott, 2008/02/03
- Re: Polyfit with scaling, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2008/02/03
- Re: Polyfit with scaling, Ben Abbott, 2008/02/03
- Re: Polyfit with scaling, Thomas Weber, 2008/02/04
- Re: Polyfit with scaling, Ben Abbott, 2008/02/04