Re: Polyfit with scaling

[Dmitri A. Sergatskov]

On Feb 3, 2008 6:20 PM, Ben Abbott <address@hidden> wrote:

> Give these results and the need to remain compatible with past expectations,
> and with Matlab, I'm inclined to make both QR and normalization optional.
>

In that case can we just leave things as they are and perhaps just add some
words to help file? (May be also pointing to the wpolyfit file).
I am curious to see how well Matlab handles your benchmark.

> In the event, the optional approach is to be used, I'm prepared to
> incorporate it in other core functions, such as residue.m.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Ben
>
>

Dmitri.
--