[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: switching from CVS to Mercurial
From: |
Shai Ayal |
Subject: |
Re: switching from CVS to Mercurial |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Feb 2008 13:21:48 +0200 |
On Feb 6, 2008 12:17 PM, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
> I've decided to go with Mercurial.
>
> I'm almost ready to switch to using it exclusively for managing the
> Octave sources, but before I do that, I thought I'd announce the
> change, let people check out the archive, and ask for comments on a
> few more things.
>
> First, I converted the CVS trunk and release-3-0-0-branch to
> Mercurial. A read-only version of the my archive is publicly
> accessible here:
>
> http://www.octave.org/hg/octave
>
> You can clone the repository with the command:
>
> hg clone http://www.octave.org/hg/octave
>
> The repository itself is approximately 47MB That includes all the
> main trunk history from the beginning of time (around August of 1993;
> I have no idea why I wasn't at least using RCS before that). I think
> the size is reasonable given that the unpacked sources are about
> 31MB. It's small compared to the full CVS archive (i.e., all the RCS
> files on the server), which occupies around 95MB.
>
cloning was straighforward using the commandline you supplied, However
the repository is 75MB on my computer (measured using du -sh octave/).
Otherwise all okks fine, and the web interface at
http://www.octave.org/hg/octave is also quite nice
Shai
Re: switching from CVS to Mercurial,
Shai Ayal <=
Re: switching from CVS to Mercurial, David Bateman, 2008/02/06
Re: switching from CVS to Mercurial, Michael Goffioul, 2008/02/06
Re: switching from CVS to Mercurial, Shai Ayal, 2008/02/06