[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [OctDev] listing functions in a package
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: [OctDev] listing functions in a package |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:40:44 -0500 |
On 19-Feb-2008, c. wrote:
|
| On 18/feb/08, at 15:25, c. wrote:
|
| > Looking at the INDEX for the signal package I also see lines like:
| >
| > arcov= use <code>ar_covar</code> $SPCTOOLS
| >
| > I was not aware that such things were possible...
| > I see this syntax is explained in the comments to main/INDEX while it
| > is not
| > on the octave-forge website (wouldn't it be worth adding at least a
| > reference
| > to this syntax specification on http://octave.sourceforge.net/
| > developers.html ?).
|
| Patch to the manual to address this.
| c.
|
| diff -r 630ddf983154 -r 45eecfa64492 doc/interpreter/package.txi
| --- a/doc/interpreter/package.txi Tue Feb 19 12:27:23 2008 +0000
| +++ b/doc/interpreter/package.txi Tue Feb 19 12:47:21 2008 +0000
Are you using mercurial to generate these diffs? If so, please send
hg changsets (created with "hg export") rather than simple diffs as I
am able to handle those faster than simple diffs.
| +If you wish to refer to a function that users might expect
| +to find in your package but is not there, providing a work around or
| +ponting out that the function is available elsewhere, you can use:
| address@hidden
| +fn = workaround description
| address@hidden example
| +This workaround description will not appear when listing functions in the
| +package with @code{pkg describe} but they will be published
Makeinfo will format the above as
[...] the function is available elsewhere, you can use:
fn = workaround description
This workaround description will not appear when listing [...]
To format it properly, you should write
ponting out that the function is available elsewhere, you can use:
@example
fn = workaround description
@end example
@noindent
This workaround description will not appear when listing functions in the
| +E.g.,
Please write "For example," instead of "E.g.".
Thanks,
jwe
- Re: listing functions in a package, (continued)
- Re: listing functions in a package, David Bateman, 2008/02/15
- Re: listing functions in a package, c., 2008/02/18
- Re: listing functions in a package, David Bateman, 2008/02/18
- Re: listing functions in a package, c., 2008/02/18
- Re: [OctDev] listing functions in a package, David Bateman, 2008/02/18
- Re: [OctDev] listing functions in a package, c., 2008/02/19
- Re: [OctDev] listing functions in a package, David Bateman, 2008/02/19
- Re: [OctDev] listing functions in a package, c., 2008/02/19
- Re: [OctDev] listing functions in a package, John W. Eaton, 2008/02/19
- Re: [OctDev] listing functions in a package, c., 2008/02/19
- Re: [OctDev] listing functions in a package,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: [OctDev] listing functions in a package, c., 2008/02/19
- Re: [OctDev] listing functions in a package, John W. Eaton, 2008/02/19
- Re: [OctDev] listing functions in a package, David Bateman, 2008/02/19
- Re: [OctDev] listing functions in a package, John W. Eaton, 2008/02/19
- Re: [OctDev] listing functions in a package, c., 2008/02/19
- Re: [OctDev] listing functions in a package, c., 2008/02/19
- Re: [OctDev] listing functions in a package, John W. Eaton, 2008/02/19