Re: [changeset] bug in edit.m

[John W. Eaton]

On 19-Feb-2008, Ben Abbott wrote:

| 
| On Feb 19, 2008, at 1:21 PM, John W. Eaton wrote:
| 
| > On 19-Feb-2008, Ben Abbott wrote:
| >
| > | No new changes.
| > |
| > | I'm resubmitting for submission to mercurial.
| >
| > Please send each changeset as a text/plain attachment.  I'm not sure
| > what is doing it, but when I receive patches from you that are
| > included inline in the mail message, lines are wrapped and that makes
| > it difficult to apply the patches.
| >
| > | # HG changeset patch
| > | # User Ben Abbott <address@hidden>
| > | # Date 1203423506 18000
| > | # Node ID 6f6a8ddf86428fec6131b024ef2b014e603524d8
| > | # Parent  2147b9f8475f5661169b95a14c8f01bcbde816e5
| > | Modified for consistency with Matlab. Modified to respect partial
| > | paths needed for overloaded functions.
| >
| > I think we'll only use these log messages for things like quickly
| > scanning changes in "hg view" to be able to pull out a patch if
| > necessary, so it would help if they were just one line and mentioned
| > the function(s) modified.  For example, something like
| >
| >  edit.m compatibility and partial path fixes

I applied this changeset with some minor style changes.

Thanks,

jwe