[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The contrast function
|
From: |
John W. Eaton |
|
Subject: |
Re: The contrast function |
|
Date: |
Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:44:17 -0400 |
On 25-Mar-2008, David Bateman wrote:
| John W. Eaton wrote:
| > It does seem like a bug that 1 is always included but you can only
| > approach 0 as N -> Inf (if I understand correctly). Unless there is
| > some good reason for doing that, I'd say go with what you have.
| >
| > jwe
| >
| >
| Ok, then changeset attached, with a minor modification.
I checked it in.
Thanks,
jwe