[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 3.0.1 release? (failed build on OSX)
From: |
Ben Abbott |
Subject: |
Re: 3.0.1 release? (failed build on OSX) |
Date: |
Fri, 04 Apr 2008 07:52:51 -0700 |
On Friday, April 04, 2008, at 10:12AM, "John W. Eaton" <address@hidden> wrote:
>On 4-Apr-2008, Ben Abbott wrote:
>
>| I've updated my sources this morning. Unfortunately, after switching
>| to the 3-0-x branch, the build of liboctave still fails as it did above.
>
>After updating and switching, did you run
>
> ./autogen.sh
> ./configure ...
>
>again before running make?
>
>jwe
>
I'm a bit more cautious than that. Since I rarely modify the sources, I make a
copy of my archive and build from there. Thus, my build process is effectively,
#! /bin/sh -ev
cd octave
hg update -C release-3-0-x
cd ..
cp -r octave octave-3-0-x
cd octave
hg update -C default
cd ../octave-3-0-x
../osx_fix.sh
./autogen.sh
./configure ...
make
make check
The "osx_fix" script comments out the "INSTANTIATE_ARRAY_AND_ASSIGN\
(std::streamoff,\ OCTAVE_API" in /iboctave/Array-so.cc.
However, since I've not previously understood how to properly switch between
branches, it makes sense for me to try the build again. I'll do that and report
back.
Ben
Re: 3.0.1 release?, Ben Abbott, 2008/04/02
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, John W. Eaton, 2008/04/02
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, Ben Abbott, 2008/04/02
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, John W. Eaton, 2008/04/02
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (failed build on OSX), Ben Abbott, 2008/04/03
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (failed build on OSX), Ben Abbott, 2008/04/04
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (failed build on OSX), John W. Eaton, 2008/04/04
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (failed build on OSX),
Ben Abbott <=
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (failed build on OSX), John W. Eaton, 2008/04/04
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (failed build on OSX), Ben Abbott, 2008/04/04
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (failed build on OSX), John W. Eaton, 2008/04/04
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (failed build on OSX), Ben Abbott, 2008/04/04
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (failed build on OSX), Ben Abbott, 2008/04/04
test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), Ben Abbott, 2008/04/02
test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), John W. Eaton, 2008/04/02
test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), John W. Eaton, 2008/04/02
Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), Ben Abbott, 2008/04/03
Re: test failures with current mercurial sources (was Re: 3.0.1 release?), John W. Eaton, 2008/04/03