[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 3.0.1 release? (Reports on mingw build)
From: |
Tatsuro MATSUOKA |
Subject: |
Re: 3.0.1 release? (Reports on mingw build) |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Apr 2008 00:22:00 +0900 (JST) |
Hello
> > OK, I made this change.
>
> I don't understand why this change is needed. At that point, windows.h
> should already
> have been included using the following sequence:
>
> file-ops.h > str-vec.h > Array.h > lo-utils.h > windows.h (around line 69).
>
> I think that the problem you have is a symptom of another problem:
> HAVE_LOADLIBRARY_API
> is not defined, that means that the configure check for LoadLibrary failed.
>
> The patch above is not a problem for MSVC. But when something does not work
> under MinGW, the first thing you should ask yourself is "Damn, why does it
> work
> under MSVC?". Because if it wouldn't work, then I would also have the problem,
> and I would probably fix it ASAP... :-)
What you said is right at this moment, I think. But I ... could not aware that
that sequence.
Under make of losystep.cc, I could not really comipile it. Errors appread were
typical
to the lost of windows.h. So I consider the patch at that moment.
>Damn, why does it work under MSVC?"
I also think what you said is completly right now. However, I thought that it
was a
careless mistake at the integrating the unixy and windowsish codes at that
moment.
That was my careless mistake.
However the problem is why the detection at configure check did not work on
MinGW.
Sorry I have no idea at this moment because it is midnight in Japan and the
problem is beyond
my head now. Please wait a while to check what was happend in MinGW.
If it is not required at patch for msvc, it should be tempoaral patch for the
MinGW build.
And modification will be deleteded at the moment for the 3.0.1 release.
We have to solve it until 3.0.2 release.
That's all What I can reply at the moment.
Regards
Tatsuro
--------------------------------------
GANBARE! NIPPON! Win your ticket to Olympic Games 2008.
http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/ganbare-nippon/
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (Report on cygwin result), (continued)
Re: 3.0.1 release? (Reports on mingw build), Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2008/04/03
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (Reports on mingw build), John W. Eaton, 2008/04/03
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (Reports on mingw build), Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2008/04/03
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (Reports on mingw build), John W. Eaton, 2008/04/03
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (Reports on mingw build), Michael Goffioul, 2008/04/07
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (Reports on mingw build), Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2008/04/07
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (Reports on mingw build), Michael Goffioul, 2008/04/07
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (Reports on mingw build), Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2008/04/07
Re: 3.0.1 release? (Reports on mingw build),
Tatsuro MATSUOKA <=
Re: 3.0.1 release?, Ben Abbott, 2008/04/02
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, John W. Eaton, 2008/04/02
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, Ben Abbott, 2008/04/02
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, John W. Eaton, 2008/04/02
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (failed build on OSX), Ben Abbott, 2008/04/03
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (failed build on OSX), Ben Abbott, 2008/04/04
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (failed build on OSX), John W. Eaton, 2008/04/04
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (failed build on OSX), Ben Abbott, 2008/04/04
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (failed build on OSX), John W. Eaton, 2008/04/04
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (failed build on OSX), Ben Abbott, 2008/04/04