[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 3.0.1 release?
From: |
Michael Goffioul |
Subject: |
Re: 3.0.1 release? |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Apr 2008 15:44:50 +0200 |
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Bateman David-ADB014
<address@hidden> wrote:
>
>
>
> The code
>
> #include <iostream>
> int main (void)
> {
> uint64_t a = 0x001FFFFFFFFFFFFFUL^0x0007FFFFFFFFFFFFUL;
> std::cerr << a << std::endl;
> return 0;
> }
>
> returns 6755399441055744, and I suspect it does something else under MSVC
I added the following line (because MSVC does not have uint64_t, and it is the
way it is done with octave):
typedef unsigned long long uint64_t;
The result is
6755399441055744
It seems to match what you expect.
Michael.
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, (continued)
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (report on mingw), Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2008/04/08
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (report on mingw), Michael Goffioul, 2008/04/08
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (report on mingw), Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2008/04/08
- Re: 3.0.1 release? (cygwin), Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2008/04/08
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, Michael Goffioul, 2008/04/08
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, David Bateman, 2008/04/08
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, Michael Goffioul, 2008/04/08
- RE: 3.0.1 release?, Bateman David-ADB014, 2008/04/08
- Re: 3.0.1 release?,
Michael Goffioul <=
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, David Bateman, 2008/04/08
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, Michael Goffioul, 2008/04/08
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, David Bateman, 2008/04/08
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, John W. Eaton, 2008/04/08
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, Michael Goffioul, 2008/04/08
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, John W. Eaton, 2008/04/08
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, Michael Goffioul, 2008/04/09
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, David Bateman, 2008/04/09
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, Michael Goffioul, 2008/04/09
- Re: 3.0.1 release?, John W. Eaton, 2008/04/09