[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: version number in default hg branch?
|
From: |
Søren Hauberg |
|
Subject: |
Re: version number in default hg branch? |
|
Date: |
Fri, 11 Apr 2008 23:09:29 +0200 |
fre, 11 04 2008 kl. 14:59 -0400, skrev John W. Eaton:
> On 11-Apr-2008, David Bateman wrote:
>
> | Could we change the version number in the default hg branch?
>
> I can change the version number in the default branch now, but what
> should it be? Should we make it 3.1.0 and count test releases as
> 3.1.1, 3.1.2, etc.? Then I suppose we would make the next stable
> release as 3.2.0 instead of 3.1.0. Is that OK?
Isn't that the way most Free projects work with version numbers? Anyway,
I think it would be nice to have development snapshots.
A related question: isn't it about time we drop the 'testing' or
'development' release? Now that 3.0 is out, can't we simply have
'stable' and 'development' releases?
Søren