Re: Bug in expm

[John W. Eaton]

On 27-Apr-2008, Marco Caliari wrote:

| > there seem to be some extra lines in the default branch, as compared
| > to the release-3-0-x version. Attached is what seems to me to be the
| > equivalent code snippet in default branch's dMatrix.cc (judging by the
| > leading and trailing comment). It seems I did the patch right, based
| > on your comments. If not, please clarify. Should release-3-0-x also be
| > patched?
| 
| It seems that the default branch has the old patch I submitted 
| (http://www.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/bug-octave/2008-January/004837.html) to 
| fix this bug, while the release-3-0-x has no patch applied at all.
| So, the default branch is not optimal and the release-3-0-x is buggy.
| In both cases, the optimal/fixed code snippet should look like the 
| one I sent in this thread (dexpm.cc and Cexpm.cc).
| Thanks for your effort to fix this bug,

If the two branches have diverged, it is not intentional.

jwe