Re: [CHANGESET]: First attempt at a single precision type.

[John W. Eaton]

On  1-May-2008, David Bateman wrote:

| John W. Eaton wrote:
| 
| > Something else to consider is that these are binary operations, so
| > maybe they should't be member functions?  These are some of the older
| > function in liboctave which were written when I didn't really know
| > what I was doing (as if I do now).
| 
| Or maybe they shouldn't exist at all... Where are stack, extract,
| extract_n actually used in Octave? If it is used could the call be
| replaced will something else? As far as I can see extract_n and stack
| aren't used and extract is only used in the pseudo_inverse method. Can
| we just drop these methods or is there code external to Octave that
| relies on them? This stuff seems like cruft to me..

If we are not using them, then it would be OK with me if they were
removed.

jwe