Re: compound operators - what next?

[Jaroslav Hajek]

On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 11:00 AM,  <address@hidden> wrote:
> Quoting Jaroslav Hajek <address@hidden>:
>>
>> exactly, exactly ...
>> I hope I did not misunderstood you; it seems to me that you are OK
>> with diag and eye
>> returning sparse matrices, right?
>>
>> What do others think?
>> I think there is good chance that Mathworks will do this anyway some
>> day, because (I think) it makes more sense.
>
> Probably a stupid question but will such a change make 'diag' and 'eye'
> useless on a system that doesn't have SuiteSparse?
>
> Søren
>
>

Absolutely not. Sparse matrices with basic arithmetic work without
suitesparse, just the factorizations don't.


-- 
RNDr. Jaroslav Hajek
computing expert
Aeronautical Research and Test Institute (VZLU)
Prague, Czech Republic
url: www.highegg.matfyz.cz