octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Changeset] Re: Faster Array transpose


From: John W. Eaton
Subject: Re: [Changeset] Re: Faster Array transpose
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 20:06:49 -0400

On  6-May-2008, David Bateman wrote:

| dbateman wrote:
| > 
| > 
| > John W. Eaton wrote:
| >> Is there a ChangeLog entry for this?  With that, I'd apply the change
| >> (but skipping the diffs for the float matrix files I don't have yet).
| >>
| > 
| > Humm, I was sure I wrote one, but it seems not. I;ll send another changeset
| > with one later.
| > 
| > All the float stuff is on my respository at hg.dbateman.org, starting at
| > changeset 8002.
| 
| The changeset is attached, however, I'm not sure how to handle the split
| between the patch of this code you'll take and the single precision code
| that you won't. So perhaps if you'd take the single precision code
| before this stuff it might be easier. Could you examine further the
| changesets
| 
| 8002
| 8003
| 8004
| 8006
| 8015
| 8017
| 8019
| 8056
| 
| from http://hg.dbateman.org/octave and see what further you'd like to be
| added to the single precision code before accepting it into 3.1..

I applied all these changesets in one batch to my archive.

| I'll work on the single precision type further in any case, including
| 
| * single precision version of quad

OK.

| * perhaps the same for daspk, glpk, etc, but less sure of that

This is not a high priority for me.

| * Move more methods from teh derived classes to the Array classes to
| clean up the code.

OK.

Thanks,

jwe


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]