Re: [Changeset] Re: Faster Array transpose

[dbateman]

John W. Eaton wrote:
> 
> | Could you examine further the changesets
> | 
> | 8002
> | 8003
> | 8004
> | 8006
> | 8015
> | 8017
> | 8019
> | 8056
> | 
> | from http://hg.dbateman.org/octave and see what further you'd like to be
> | added to the single precision code before accepting it into 3.1..
> 
> I applied all these changesets in one batch to my archive.
> 

Ok some other changesets from my repository that relate to the single
precision type that should be merged are

8072 8073 8076 8077 8094



> | I'll work on the single precision type further in any case, including
> | 
> | * single precision version of quad
> 
> OK.
> 

Done in the above changesets.



> | * perhaps the same for daspk, glpk, etc, but less sure of that
> 
> This is not a high priority for me.
> 

Me neither, but getting the base classes for this templatized for
float/double would be useful and is what I was currently doing, though being
a new dad for the last five days has more or less stopped me for the moment.



> | * Move more methods from teh derived classes to the Array classes to
> | clean up the code.
> 
> OK.
> 

This and the single precision test code is the major thing still to do for
this.

Cheers
David

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Faster-Array-transpose-tp16992703p17364289.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.