[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Merging graphics branch
From: |
Michael Goffioul |
Subject: |
Re: Merging graphics branch |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Jun 2008 07:00:05 +0200 |
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:37 PM, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 18-Jun-2008, Michael Goffioul wrote:
>
> | Actually, Matlab supports both. Value classes are what is currently
> | present in octave. Handle classes are somehow a generalization of
> | what the current graphics system implements, where objects act
> | more like pointers.
>
> OK, so should we be thinking about ways to implement the handle graphics
> system as these new kinds of objects? If so, then I think that is a
> relatively big project. I know that I don't have time at the moment
> to think about how this should be done.
That is indeed a quite big long-term project. From an implementation
point-of-view, I feel this would re-use elements from octave_class and
the current graphics system. I'll keep this in my mind for the time
being. I don't have the time to work on this neither.
Michael.
- Re: Merging graphics branch, John W. Eaton, 2008/06/05
- Re: Merging graphics branch, John Swensen, 2008/06/05
- Re: Merging graphics branch, Michael Goffioul, 2008/06/16
- Re: Merging graphics branch, Michael Goffioul, 2008/06/16
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Merging graphics branch, Bill Denney, 2008/06/16
- Re: Merging graphics branch, Michael Goffioul, 2008/06/16
- Re: Merging graphics branch, Michael Goffioul, 2008/06/17
- Re: Merging graphics branch, John W. Eaton, 2008/06/18
- Re: Merging graphics branch, Michael Goffioul, 2008/06/18
- Re: Merging graphics branch, John W. Eaton, 2008/06/18
- Re: Merging graphics branch,
Michael Goffioul <=
Re: Merging graphics branch, Michael Goffioul, 2008/06/05