[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FTGL.h not found
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: FTGL.h not found |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Jul 2008 12:53:28 -0400 |
On 17-Jul-2008, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
| is it possible to simply support both 2.1.2 and 2.1.3? Or are they too
| incompatible?
I don't think there is any code in Octave that specifically depends on
the newer version. It's just a matter of making the configure check
do the right thing. What's the best way to write the check so it
distinguishes between FTGL.h and ftgl.h? I think by default, autoconf
would generate HAVE_FTGL_H for both.
jwe
- Re: FTGL.h not found, (continued)
- Re: FTGL.h not found, Thomas Weber, 2008/07/10
- Re: FTGL.h not found, John W. Eaton, 2008/07/10
- Re: FTGL.h not found, John W. Eaton, 2008/07/10
- Re: FTGL.h not found, Thomas Treichl, 2008/07/10
- Re: FTGL.h not found, John W. Eaton, 2008/07/10
- Re: FTGL.h not found, Thomas Treichl, 2008/07/11
- Re: FTGL.h not found, Thomas Treichl, 2008/07/11
- Re: FTGL.h not found, David Bateman, 2008/07/17
- Re: FTGL.h not found, David Bateman, 2008/07/17
- Re: FTGL.h not found, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/07/17
- Re: FTGL.h not found,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: FTGL.h not found, Jaroslav Hajek, 2008/07/18
- Re: FTGL.h not found, John W. Eaton, 2008/07/21
- Re: FTGL.h not found, Michael Goffioul, 2008/07/21
- Re: FTGL.h not found, Thomas Weber, 2008/07/27