Re: Removing control, finance and quaternion toolboxes

[David Bateman]

John W. Eaton wrote:
> | I also have the patch that
> | 
> | * adds these functions to octave
> | * Changes the copyrights to remove all mention to the functions being a
> | apart of Octave itself
> | * Recover any documentation that was part of Octave and ensure that it
> | builds and is packaged.
> | 
> | You can get this patch at
> | 
> | http://www.fladenmuller.org/octave/of_patch.bz2
> | 
> | as it is also very large.. I don't want to apply this patch to
> | octave-forge till then next octave-forge release after which we can
> | convert octave-forge for use with an upcoming 3.2.0 release.
>
> OK.  When do you expect to do a new octave-forge release?  If it will
> be a while, then perhaps I should temporarily include these packages
> in the Octave source tree.
>   
Well it really depends on the 3.2 release schedule.. You're talking a 
couple of months, so it probably makes sense to have one more 
octave-forge release for 3.0.x, probably at the time you release 3.0.2 
and then convert everything to support 3.1.x, and at that point these 
toolboxes can be added to octave-forge.. If you think its an issue that 
these toolboxes aren't available somewhere I suppose we can branch 
octave-forge now and apply the patch for these toolboxes on the branch, 
though I think it makes sense to avoid that if possible due to the 
division of work needed to support both trees.

Regards
David

--
David Bateman                                address@hidden
Motorola Labs - Paris                        +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph) 
Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin    +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob) 
91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE                  +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax) 

The information contained in this communication has been classified as: 

[x] General Business Information 
[ ] Motorola Internal Use Only 
[ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary