Re: Removing control, finance and quaternion toolboxes

[Søren Hauberg]

tir, 29 07 2008 kl. 17:36 +0200, skrev David Bateman:
> Well it really depends on the 3.2 release schedule.. You're talking a 
> couple of months, so it probably makes sense to have one more 
> octave-forge release for 3.0.x, probably at the time you release 3.0.2 
> and then convert everything to support 3.1.x, and at that point these 
> toolboxes can be added to octave-forge.. If you think its an issue that 
> these toolboxes aren't available somewhere I suppose we can branch 
> octave-forge now and apply the patch for these toolboxes on the branch, 
> though I think it makes sense to avoid that if possible due to the 
> division of work needed to support both trees.

I'd really like to avoid having two branches in Octave-Forge. Can't we
simply add the packages, and let them require Octave 3.1.50 or later?

Søren