Re: "Octave" namespace for Octave C++ sources for 3.2?

[Jaroslav Hajek]

On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 10:08 PM, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
> I'd like to consider wrapping Octave's classes in a separate
> namespace.  I think we could do it for 3.2, but maybe there is some
> reason to avoid this change?  Does anyone have any strong objections
> to doing this?  Other comments?

Perhaps making a configure switch for that would be a good idea. Or a
switch for automatic inclusion of "using namespace octave" in a
suitable place.  Also, there probably should be a  #define indicating
that the namespace is in use, so that people can write packages
compatible with both 3.0 and 3.2 versions.
Ideally, any package in OctaveForge should be able to work in 3.2
after a trivial update.


>
> Thanks,
>
> jwe
>



-- 
RNDr. Jaroslav Hajek
computing expert
Aeronautical Research and Test Institute (VZLU)
Prague, Czech Republic
url: www.highegg.matfyz.cz