Re: stem series objects

[David Bateman]

Michael Goffioul wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 2:22 PM, David Bateman
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>   
> > > 3) the off-by-1 error was intentional. In Matlab, callbacks are
> > > always called with at least 2 arguments: the handle of the object
> > > and an optional data specific to the event (for instance, a keypress
> > > event will contain information about the key pressed). Then other
> > > possible arguments are appended, in case the callback has the
> > > form address@hidden, p1, p2, ...}
> > >
> > >       
> > yes, but then I saw that the function call had to have the form
> >
> > function fun (h, d, f, p1, p2)
> >
> > rather than
> >
> > function fun (h, d, p1, p2)
> >
> > as I would have expected from the documentation. Are you sure of your
> > explanation? In any case I left my change to this in for now.
> >     
>
> OK, I found the error: the starting index of the for-loop should be
> 1 instead of 0. The 2-offset for args should be left untouched. Can
> you fix it?
>
> Michael.
>
>   
This is the change I in fact made in my original changeset.. So this 
should be left alone.

D.

--
David Bateman                                address@hidden
Motorola Labs - Paris                        +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph) 
Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin    +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob) 
91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE                  +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax) 

The information contained in this communication has been classified as: 

[x] General Business Information 
[ ] Motorola Internal Use Only 
[ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary