Ben Abbott wrote:
On Tuesday, October 07, 2008, at 08:55AM, "David Bateman" <address@hidden
> wrote:
Michael Goffioul wrote:
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Ben Abbott <address@hidden>
wrote:
Hi Michael,
You are certainly correct. I was stuck in the context of Octave
prior to the
objects and properties. Thanks.
Regarding __go_delete__, I'm not proficient in c++. Can you make
this
change?
Honestly, no. I'm completely overbooked for the next couple of
weeks (at least until beginning of November).
Michael.
Hey, its a pretty trivial patch, and i attach it here...
D.
David, the changeset did not apply to my copy of jwe's default
archive (3.1.51).
I presume you mean the tip of John's repository. I can't generate a
new
changeset easily, and I've merged some additional changes from John's
tree, but I don't see why it doesn't apply cleanly except for the
ChangeLog as it only affects graphics.cc
When I attempted to apply it manually ...
graphics.cc:1359: error: ?h? was not declared in this scope
graphics.cc:1363: error: no matching function for call to ?
gh_manager::get_object(<type error>)?
graphics.h:8573: note: candidates are: static graphics_object
gh_manager::get_object(const graphics_handle&)
graphics.cc:1369: error: no matching function for call to ?
graphics_object::remove_child(<type error>)?
graphics.h:2242: note: candidates are: void
graphics_object::remove_child(const graphics_handle&)
graphics.cc:1384: error: ?h? was not declared in this scope
make[2]: *** [pic/graphics.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [src] Error 2
make: *** [all] Error 2
When time permits I suspect I'll eventually figure out the problem
(perhaps I misplaced a "}"?), but if you have time to generate a
changeset that cleanly applies, I'd appreciate it.
Very weird. Maybe there was a problem with your manual inclusion of
the
changeset as ?h? is definitely not part of the changeset..
Cheers
David