Re: combining nchoosek with bincoeff

[dbateman]

On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 12:04:53PM +0100, Francesco Potort? wrote:
> > From the above it seems to me you're saying that in fact bincoeff and 
> >nchoosek in fact have significant differences. I'd say make change 1a) 
> >and remove the fixme.. Do you want to update your nchoosek changeset, 
> >and I'll apply it..
> 
> I made first a changeset to nchoosek, then one more, with respect to the
> previous one.  Should I make one more, with respect to the last one?
> That would make three changesets in a chain.
> 
> If you prefer a single changeset with respect to the official version (I
> do not know mercurial terminology) please suggest me how to do it using
> the hg command, as I could not understand it quickly by reading the
> docs... 

Ok, then don't worry we can apply the three changeset seperately.. Don't have 
much time at 
the moment so I 'll aplly your changes for nchoosek later if some one else 
doesn't do it 
first

D.


> 
> -- 
> Francesco Potort? (ricercatore)        Voice: +39 050 315 3058 (op.2111)
> ISTI - Area della ricerca CNR          Fax:   +39 050 315 2040
> via G. Moruzzi 1, I-56124 Pisa         Email: address@hidden
> (entrance 20, 1st floor, room C71)     Web:   http://fly.isti.cnr.it/
>