[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: porting arapck code to octave
From: |
Thomas Weber |
Subject: |
Re: porting arapck code to octave |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Dec 2008 17:39:14 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 05:00:00AM -0800, dbateman wrote:
>
>
>
> Thomas Weber-8 wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 12:44:36AM +0100, David Bateman wrote:
> >> David Bateman wrote:
> >> Ok, it seems that if I use the version of arpack from
> >>
> >> http://mathema.tician.de/dl/software/arpack-autotools
> >>
> >> that contains a few bug fixes and a build with libtool then I can get
> >> eigs to work correctly... The reason I was building ARPACK myself in the
> >> first place was that the version that seems to bee distributed with
> >> debian isn't built with gfortran with the version in testing..
> >
> > I'm not sure I'm parsing your sentence correctly, but arpack in Debian
> > testing is compiled with gfortran-4.3.
> >
> >
>
> Is it? For my machine, that is using "debain testing", when I installed
> "arpack2-dev" it seemed it was compiled with g95 so I had problems linking
> to it..
According to
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=422297
g95 is not in Debian. There is however a slight chance that the
maintainer has it installed on his machine. What architecture is your
machine (AMD64 or i386)?
Thomas
- Re: porting arapck code to octave, (continued)
- Re: porting arapck code to octave, David Bateman, 2008/12/20
- Re: porting arapck code to octave, David Bateman, 2008/12/22
- Re: porting arapck code to octave, David Bateman, 2008/12/22
- Re: porting arapck code to octave, David Bateman, 2008/12/23
- Re: porting arapck code to octave, Thomas Weber, 2008/12/23
- Re: porting arapck code to octave, dbateman, 2008/12/23
- Re: porting arapck code to octave,
Thomas Weber <=
- Re: porting arapck code to octave, dbateman, 2008/12/23