Re: error compiling 3.0.x in ov-base-scalar.h (mingw32)

[Jaroslav Hajek]

On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Benjamin Lindner <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I did a build of current 3.0.x HG sources for mingw32 and compilation fails
> with the error
>
> mingw32-g++-4.3.0-dw2 -c -march=i686 -mtune=generic -I.
> -I/octaveforge_mingw32/octave/octave-3.0.x/src -I.. -I../liboctave -I../src
> -I../libcruft/misc -I/octaveforge_mingw32/octave/octave-3.0.x
> -I/octaveforge_mingw32/octave/octave-3.0.x/liboctave
> -I/octaveforge_mingw32/octave/octave-3.0.x/src
> -I/octaveforge_mingw32/octave/octave-3.0.x/libcruft/misc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
> -mieee-fp -Wall -W -Wshadow -Wold-style-cast -D_DLL -O2 -Wall
> /octaveforge_mingw32/octave/octave-3.0.x/src/bitfcns.cc -o bitfcns.o
> In file included from
> d:/files/admin/octaveforge_svn/trunk/octave-forge/admin/Windows/mingw32/octave/octave-3.0.x/src/ov-base-int.h:39,
>                 from
> d:/files/admin/octaveforge_svn/trunk/octave-forge/admin/Windows/mingw32/octave/octave-3.0.x/src/ov-intx.h:36,
>                 from
> d:/files/admin/octaveforge_svn/trunk/octave-forge/admin/Windows/mingw32/octave/octave-3.0.x/src/ov-uint64.h:38,
>                 from
> d:/files/admin/octaveforge_svn/trunk/octave-forge/admin/Windows/mingw32/octave/octave-3.0.x/src/bitfcns.cc:33:
> d:/files/admin/octaveforge_svn/trunk/octave-forge/admin/Windows/mingw32/octave/octave-3.0.x/src/ov-base-scalar.h:93:
> error: 'octave_value octave_base_scalar<ST>::reshape(const dim_vector&)
> const' cannot be overloaded
> d:/files/admin/octaveforge_svn/trunk/octave-forge/admin/Windows/mingw32/octave/octave-3.0.x/src/ov-base-scalar.h:90:
> error: with 'octave_value octave_base_scalar<ST>::reshape(const dim_vector&)
> const'
>
> Looking into ov-base-scalar.h I see that there is indeed a method reshape(),
> but it's defined *twice*
>
> <snip>
>   octave_value reshape (const dim_vector& new_dims) const
>       { return array_value ().reshape (new_dims); }
>
>   octave_value reshape (const dim_vector& new_dims) const
>       { return array_value ().reshape (new_dims); }
> </snip>
>
> and the changelog tells that the method reshape() was added indeed twice in
> rev 7619 and 7621
>
> Is this intentional?
>
> benjamin
>

Where did you get the sources? The duplicated 7621 was backed out by 7632.


-- 
RNDr. Jaroslav Hajek
computing expert
Aeronautical Research and Test Institute (VZLU)
Prague, Czech Republic
url: www.highegg.matfyz.cz