Re: Octave 3.1.51 (latest on hg) under Linux (SUSE 11.1) problem

[Khaled]

I compared ATLAS vs MKL, found that MKL is factor faster than ATLAS!!

:confused:



John W. Eaton-3 wrote:
> 
> On  5-Jan-2009, Khaled wrote:
> 
> | 
> | Thanks Jaroslav for your reply!
> | 
> |   But I don´t Know how to compile Octave using ifort!! I did not found
> the
> | suitable linking command on the internet. For example, the ifort is
> | installed under 
> | 
> | /opt/intel/Compiler/bin/intel64/ifort
> | 
> | and the libs are listed under
> | 
> | /opt/intel/Compiler/lib/intel64/
> 
> Why not simplify things and use ATLAS instead of mkl?
> 
> jwe
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Octave-3.1.51-%28latest-on-hg%29-under-Linux-%28SUSE-11.1%29-problem-tp21289572p21301550.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.