Re: Objects and OOP

[John W. Eaton]

On  8-Jan-2009, Ryan Rusaw wrote:

| On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Michael Goffioul
| <address@hidden> wrote:
| > On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 9:02 PM, David Bateman <address@hidden> wrote:
| >> Sure, I believe the OOP features already do what John wants so I don't 
think
| >> he'll do the rest. However, you might prefer to look at the classdef 
support
| >> rather than inheritance in the older OOP code. I believe Michael Goffioul
| >> send some code with the start of this in November..
| >
| > Nothing functional, I'm afraid. It was basically a skeleton implementing
| > meta-object protocol. I didn't have time to continue further yet.
| >
| > Michael.
| >
| 
| I had some idle time over my 2 weeks off for the winter holiday
| season, so I added classdef support to the parser and lexer as well as
| preliminary +package directory support.
| 
| I've only just started the work on fleshing out Michael's meta-object
| code and integrating it with the parser though, so it's far from being
| complete as well.

Please consider posting patches as you complete small parts of this
work.  Integrating those would be easier for us than if you wait and
send some large patch that touches many files.

jwe