[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Octave & Fortran continued
|
From: |
John W. Eaton |
|
Subject: |
Re: Octave & Fortran continued |
|
Date: |
Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:35:14 -0500 |
On 11-Jan-2009, Michael Goffioul wrote:
| Indeed, it's only naming. More important to me is whether shared
| libstdc++ is required for octave or not.
I don't think it is required, but having it as a shared library
greatly reduces the size of .oct files.
jwe
- Re: Octave & Fortran continue, (continued)
Re: Octave & Fortran continued, Benjamin Lindner, 2009/01/08
- Re: Octave & Fortran continued, Michael Goffioul, 2009/01/08
- Re: Octave & Fortran continued, John W. Eaton, 2009/01/12
- Re: Octave & Fortran continued, Benjamin Lindner, 2009/01/12
- Re: Octave & Fortran continued, Michael Goffioul, 2009/01/12
- Re: Octave & Fortran continued, Benjamin Lindner, 2009/01/13
- Re: Octave & Fortran continued, Michael Goffioul, 2009/01/13
- Re: Octave & Fortran continued, Christopher Hulbert, 2009/01/13