[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Changing package file extension
|
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
|
Subject: |
Re: Changing package file extension |
|
Date: |
Fri, 23 Jan 2009 09:49:50 -0600 |
2008/11/2 Soren Hauberg <address@hidden>:
> image-1.0.6.octpkg
>
> (or something similar) instead of
>
> image-1.0.6.tar.gz
I think this is really good idea. I support filename extensions that
are descriptive of the purpose, not necessarily the format. After all,
Debian packages are .deb, not .ar even if they *are* .ar archives, and
Java packages, OpenOffice.org documents are .jar and .od* even if they
both are just .zip archives, and configuration files are .conf, not
.txt, etc.
- Jordi G. H.
- Changing package file extension, John W. Eaton, 2009/01/22
- Re: Changing package file extension,
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <=
- Re: Changing package file extension, John W. Eaton, 2009/01/27
- Re: Changing package file extension, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2009/01/29
- Re: Changing package file extension, John W. Eaton, 2009/01/29
- Re: Changing package file extension, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2009/01/29
- Re: Changing package file extension, John W. Eaton, 2009/01/29
- Re: Changing package file extension, Søren Hauberg, 2009/01/29
- Re: Changing package file extension, David Bateman, 2009/01/29
- Re: Changing package file extension, John W. Eaton, 2009/01/29
- Re: Changing package file extension, Søren Hauberg, 2009/01/29
- Re: Changing package file extension, John W. Eaton, 2009/01/29