Re: Further on MEX

[John W. Eaton]

On  8-Jan-2009, Thomas Weber wrote:

| Am Mittwoch, den 07.01.2009, 22:20 +0100 schrieb David Bateman:
| > John W. Eaton wrote:
| > I thought the LSB specified architecture dependent and independent 
| > directories 
| 
| Yes[1].
| 
| > and so the mex files should always be in different 
| > directories for different platforms if packaged correctly.
| 
| No. The platform-specific files go into /usr/lib, platform-independent
| files into /usr/share. 
| So, you will have the .mex file in a directory under /usr/lib, but that
| directory name is the same for every architecture.

But aren't they installed in directories with names like

  /usr/lib/octave/3.0.3/oct/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/qr.oct

so these files are installed in directories with names derived from
the architecture?

Am I missing something?

jwe