Re: 3.0.4 RC3

[Tatsuro MATSUOKA]

Hello 

The modification is not apropriate so that nchoosek.m test still cause an error.

http://www-old.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/octave-maintainers/2009-January/010175.html
not -1e-14 but -1e-13, I think

Please apply patch the last part of this mail

BTW
Hi Marco!

The file of 'ReadmeCygwin' in 3.0.4RC3 source have not been revised, please 
send the patch for it.

Regards

Tatsuro

--- ./octave-3.0.4RC3-org/scripts/specfun/nchoosek.m    2009-01-29 
16:49:00.000000000 +0900
+++ ./octave-3.0.4RC3/scripts/specfun/nchoosek.m        2009-01-31 
12:50:54.838000000 +0900
@@ -96,5 +96,5 @@
   endif
 endfunction

-%!assert (nchoosek(100,45), bincoeff(100,45), -1e-14)
+%!assert (nchoosek(100,45), bincoeff(100,45), -1e-13)
 %!assert 
(nchoosek(1:5,3),[1:3;1,2,4;1,2,5;1,3,4;1,3,5;1,4,5;2:4;2,3,5;2,4,5;3:5]) 

--- Marco Atzeri wrote:

> 
> --- Jaroslav Hajek ha scritto:
> 
> > hello,
> > 
> > the octave 3.0.4 rc3 tarballs are available from the
> > usual location:
> >
> http://artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~hajej2am/ulozna/octave/
> > 
> > sorry for the longer delays. I've only recently
> > discovered a day is
> > limited to 24 hours.
> > 
> > cheers
> > 
> > -- 
> > RNDr. Jaroslav Hajek
> > computing expert
> > Aeronautical Research and Test Institute (VZLU)
> > Prague, Czech Republic
> > url: www.highegg.matfyz.cz
> > 
> Hi Jaroslav,
> 
> for cygwin is fine
> the only fail is the already known :
> 
>   ***** assert (nchoosek(100,45), bincoeff(100,45),
> -1e-14)
> !!!!! test failed
> error: assert (nchoosek (100, 45),bincoeff (100,
> 45),-1e-14) expected
>  6.1448e+28
> but got
>  6.1448e+28
> maximum relative error 2.83429e-14 exceeds tolerance
> 1e-14
> >>
> 
> Thanks
> Marco
> 
> 
> 
>       
> 


--------------------------------------
Power up the Internet with Yahoo! Toolbar.
http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/toolbar/