octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A multiple definition error in Creating library file: liboctave.dll.


From: Benjamin Lindner
Subject: Re: A multiple definition error in Creating library file: liboctave.dll.a (gcc-4.3.2-dw2-TDM for mingw )
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 20:48:28 +0100
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105)





Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote:
Hello

Today it is national holiday in Japan.
I have tried to build octave-3.1.52 using gcc-4.3.2-dw2-TDM for mingw.

An previous thread of
"int64NDArray.cc cannot be complied on gcc-3.45 mingw for octave-3.1.52"
http://www.nabble.com/int64NDArray.cc-cannot-be-complied-on-gcc-3.45-mingw-for-octave-3.1.52-to21927353.html

was not happened in the case of gcc-4.3.2-dw2-TDM for mingw.

However I met another error.

A multiple definition error in Creating library file: liboctave.dll.a.

Creating library file: liboctave.dll.a
Sparse-C.o:Sparse-C.cc:(.text$_ZN11octave_sortISt7complexIdEE17ascending_compareES1_S1_[octave_sort<std::complex<double>
::ascending_compare(std::complex<double>, std::complex<double>)]+0x0):
multiple definition of `octave_sort<std::complex<double> >::ascending_compare(std::complex<double>,
std::complex<double>)'
Array-C.o:c:\usr\Tatsu\mingwhome\octaves\octave-3.1.52\liboctave/Array-C.cc:44:
first defined here

Mmmm??


I can try this as cross-check. I did a 4.3.2-2 build if the development sources some time ago as a proof-of-concept-check and encountered no error.
let's see...


Ok, I can reproduce this error with both 4.3.2-2 and 4.3.0-2 of TDM's gcc port. I see that r8700:314be237cd5b changed a bunch of code and also introcuded the doubly-defined function octave_sort<std::complex<double> >::ascending_compare(std::complex<double> const&, std::complex<double> const&)
which ld complains about

hmm, I don't see the bug in the code immediately.

Is this error seen on other platforms too, or is it a mingw-specific gcc/ld problem?

benjamin


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]