[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
why do we still have stdnormal_{cdf,inv,pdf,rnd}?
|
From: |
John W. Eaton |
|
Subject: |
why do we still have stdnormal_{cdf,inv,pdf,rnd}? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:49:21 -0500 |
Does anyone know if there is some reason that these functions have not
been moved to the deprecated directory yet? It seems that Matlab uses
the names normcdf, norminv, normpdf, and normrnd, and Octave also has
those now. So unless anyone objects, I think we should move these to
the deprecated directory before the 3.2 release.
stdnormal_cdf
stdnormal_inv
stdnormal_pdf
stdnormal_rnd
jwe
- why do we still have stdnormal_{cdf,inv,pdf,rnd}?,
John W. Eaton <=