[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux |
Date: |
Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:34:21 -0500 |
On 22-Feb-2009, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
| * Jaroslav Hajek <address@hidden> [2009-02-22 18:55]:
|
| > I don't say it's impossible, but I do not see how it can actually be
| > possible, unless int64_t is a typedef of double (which would really be
| > weird).
|
| Not even that causes a compilation error on my amd64 Debian system.
How is int64_t defined on the systems where the failure happens?
jwe
- 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux, Rafael Laboissiere, 2009/02/22
- Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/02/22
- Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux, Rafael Laboissiere, 2009/02/22
- Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux, Marco Atzeri, 2009/02/22
- Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/02/22
- Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux, Rafael Laboissiere, 2009/02/22
- Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux, Rafael Laboissiere, 2009/02/22
- Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux, Rafael Laboissiere, 2009/02/22
- Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/02/22
- Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux, Rafael Laboissiere, 2009/02/22
- Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/02/22
- Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux, Marco Atzeri, 2009/02/22
- Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux, Marco Atzeri, 2009/02/22
- Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/02/22
- Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux, Rafael Laboissiere, 2009/02/22
- Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux, Marco Atzeri, 2009/02/22