[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] Implement basic sparse op diag and diag op sparse su
|
From: |
John W. Eaton |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] Implement basic sparse op diag and diag op sparse support. |
|
Date: |
Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:14:13 -0400 |
On 12-Mar-2009, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
| I basically agree with these changes, because their logic is
| undeniable (that was a good film :-). I would, however, like to see
| more people say "yes" before including them for 3.2.x.
These changes only involve sparse x diag or sparse x perm matrix
operations, right? If so, then I suppose it would be OK to include
them in 3.2. But we do have to stop somewhere and actually make a
release (assuming, of course, that people want actual releases and not
just a long series of snapshots like we had from 1997--2007...
jwe
- Re: [PATCH 4 of 4] Implement diag + sparse, diag - sparse, sparse + diag, sparse - diag, (continued)