[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: after 3.2
From: |
Søren Hauberg |
Subject: |
Re: after 3.2 |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Mar 2009 21:02:43 +0100 |
tor, 12 03 2009 kl. 15:55 -0400, skrev John W. Eaton:
> I'd still like to see us reduce the interval
> between stable releases to something like 6-9 months, so I think doing
> that will require focusing on a smaller list of projects for each
> release, then making the release and moving on instead of allowing the
> list of projects to continually expand (this is something I need to
> work on as much as anyone else).
Perhaps we should move to time based (rather than feature based)
releases? That is, when 3.2 is released we decide on a data for the next
release and then stick to it. This approach seems to have served other
projects (e.g. GNOME) quite well.
Soren
- after 3.2, John W. Eaton, 2009/03/12
- Re: after 3.2,
Søren Hauberg <=
- Re: after 3.2, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/03/12
- Re: after 3.2, Thomas Weber, 2009/03/13
- Re: after 3.2, John W. Eaton, 2009/03/13
- Re: after 3.2, Thomas Weber, 2009/03/13
- Re: after 3.2, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/03/15
- Re: after 3.2, Bill Denney, 2009/03/15
- Re: after 3.2, Jaroslav Hajek, 2009/03/15
- Re: after 3.2, Rafael Laboissiere, 2009/03/15
- Re: after 3.2, John W. Eaton, 2009/03/15
- Re: after 3.2, Rafael Laboissiere, 2009/03/15