[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 3.0.4 RC3 (mingw 3.4.5)-2
From: |
Tatsuro MATSUOKA |
Subject: |
Re: 3.0.4 RC3 (mingw 3.4.5)-2 |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:55:29 +0900 (JST) |
Hello Benjamin
Thank you for your reply.
I will wait your work. Please tell me if you have finished the work through
this threads.
I will carry out the checks on both mingw (cr+lf) and cygwin (lf).
Regards
Tatsuro
--- Benjamin Lindner wrote:
> Without this line, I still get a failure in ov-fcn-handle.cc
> And I guess the errors Tatsuro reported also base on this.
>
> This line is required because the code
>
> if (c != '\n' && c != '\r')
> {
> value << c;
> while (is.get (c) && c != '\n' && c != '\r')
> value << c;
> }
>
> retval = value.str ();
> break;
>
> leaves a stray '\n' in the input stream if line endings are CRLF, since
> the while () loop breaks at the first '\r' and the following '\n' is not
> removed.
>
> OK, I'll think of a workaround
>
> benjamin
--------------------------------------
Power up the Internet with Yahoo! Toolbar.
http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/toolbar/
- Re: 3.0.4 RC3 (mingw 3.4.5)-2, (continued)
- Re: 3.0.4 RC3 (mingw 3.4.5)-2, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2009/03/04
- Re: 3.0.4 RC3 (mingw 3.4.5)-2, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2009/03/04
- Re: 3.0.4 RC3 (mingw 3.4.5)-2, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2009/03/05
- Re: 3.0.4 RC3 (mingw 3.4.5)-2, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2009/03/05
- Re: 3.0.4 RC3 (mingw 3.4.5)-2, Benjamin Lindner, 2009/03/08
- Re: 3.0.4 RC3 (mingw 3.4.5)-2, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2009/03/09
- Re: 3.0.4 RC3 (mingw 3.4.5)-2, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2009/03/09
Re: 3.0.4 RC3 (mingw 3.4.5)-2, John W. Eaton, 2009/03/10