Re: 3.0.5 ?

[Thomas Weber]

On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 11:02:37AM +0200, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
> Well the fix is available in the archive, so anyone can download it to
> patch the sources. I have no problem with making a new release
> containing just this single bugfix, though I myself have no need for
> it. Should it be named 3.0.5, 3.0.4-1 or something like that? Or
> should we just re-release 3.0.4?

Please, never, ever re-release a tarball. This breaks all kind of
automatic version checkers, checksum testers and so on.

There's nothing wrong with a 3.0.5 tarball.

        Thomas