[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing
From: |
Judd Storrs |
Subject: |
Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing |
Date: |
Wed, 8 Apr 2009 18:20:10 -0400 |
I think the proposed FAQ is very well written, precise and accurate.
A suggestion you can take or leave is that it might not be clear to
someone reading the FAQ what is meant by "compatible with the GPL".
Maybe punting a link to the FSF's GPL pages would help, something
along the lines of adding
For more information about GPL-compatible licenses see
http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses
to the end of the first answer.
--judd
- Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing, (continued)
- Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing, John W. Eaton, 2009/04/08
- Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing, Judd Storrs, 2009/04/08
- Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing, Judd Storrs, 2009/04/08
- Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing, John W. Eaton, 2009/04/08
- Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing, Judd Storrs, 2009/04/08
- Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing, John W. Eaton, 2009/04/08
- Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing, Judd Storrs, 2009/04/08
- Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing, John W. Eaton, 2009/04/08
Re: proposed FAQ entries about licensing,
Judd Storrs <=