octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

stable branch release policy [was Re: Possible bug in intersect]


From: Carlo de Falco
Subject: stable branch release policy [was Re: Possible bug in intersect]
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 10:06:20 +0200


On 11 Apr 2009, at 22:54, Carlo de Falco wrote:


On 11 Apr 2009, at 19:03, address@hidden wrote:

Message: 3
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 17:38:51 +0200
From: Thomas Weber <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: Possible bug in intersect
To: Jaroslav Hajek <address@hidden>
Cc: Massimiliano Culpo <address@hidden>, address@hidden
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 02:11:25PM +0200, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Massimiliano Culpo
<address@hidden> wrote:
Please find attached a possible bug occurring in octave-3.0.4.
The same behavior is very likely to be found also in octave-3.0.5.

Massimiliano Culpo


I fixed this in the development sources.

Test for this bug attached.

        Thomas
-------------- next part --------------
# HG changeset patch
# User Thomas Weber <address@hidden>
# Date 1239464264 -7200
# Node ID 68036841138c9ef0365ff0f188f3edfee8eb8460
# Parent  22ae6b3411a769d62f66f196473336440194404a
Add test for bugfix b2459d21a207

diff --git a/scripts/set/intersect.m b/scripts/set/intersect.m
--- a/scripts/set/intersect.m
+++ b/scripts/set/intersect.m
@@ -104,3 +104,8 @@
%! assert(ib,[3;1]);
%! assert(a(ia,:),c);
%! assert(b(ib,:),c);
+%!test
+%! a = [1 1 1 2 2 2];
+%! b = [1 2 3; 4 5 6];
+%! c = intersect(a,b);
+%! assert(c, [1,2]);

------------------------------

This behaviour is not compatible:

---------
>> a = [1 1 1 2 2 2]

a =

    1     1     1     2     2     2

>> b = [1 2 3; 3 2 1]

b =

    1     2     3
    3     2     1

>> intersect(a,b)
??? Error using ==> intersect at 51
A and B must be vectors, or 'rows' must be specified.

>> intersect(a,b,'rows')
??? Error using ==> intersect at 198
A and B must have the same number of columns.

>> version

ans =

7.5.0.338 (R2007b)

>>
---------

I would suggest to change the test to

---------
c = intersect(a,b(:));
assert(c, [1,2]);
---------

so that it won't fail if intersect gets changed to be strictly compatible.
c.


Hi,

It seems this bug was introduced inbetween releases 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 by the following changeset:

hg log -r 7920
changeset:   7920:e56bb65186f6
user:        Jaroslav Hajek <address@hidden>
date:        Wed Jun 25 22:11:07 2008 +0200
summary:     improve set functions for Matlab compatibility

so the question I have is, is there a "bug-fixes only, no new features" policy for the "stable" branch?

Now, this particular bug is probably to be considered minor as compared to the one in "load -ascii" so I'm not sure whether it is worth a 3.0.6 release, but, as it is found in an m-file, maybe a warning about the bug and a link to the 3.0.3 version of the set scripts on the web page would suffice?

As an other alternative to new releases in the stable branch, to fix bugs in m-files and DLD functions maybe a "bugfix" package in Octave- Forge could be used?

Sorry if my suggestions sound stupid, I was just trying to think of a way to keep the number of bugs in the stable branch a monotone non- increasing function of the release number while requiring as little effort on developers like Jaroslav whos precious time is better spent on improving the development version.

c.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]