Re: [OctDev] No symbolic package in future (Windows/VC++) releases

[Judd Storrs]

On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:27 PM, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:

I don't see a statement saying that it is strictly GPLv2.  Yes, he
says GPLv2, but he doesn't say that there is no possibility to use a
later version if you wish.

I was going off of the COPYING file and his repeated specific demands to comply with GPL version 2 in the linked conversation. If his intent was just to demand generic GPL compliance, why would he specifically say "GPLv2"?

--judd