Re: OOP load update

[John W. Eaton]

On  6-May-2009, Robert T. Short wrote:

| The only difference between the above and what is done now is that I 
| don't currently execute the class constructor.

The change that I suggested earlier called the constructor if the
exemplar table did not have an object with the given name.  I thought
you used that as a starting point for your most recent changes.  My
patch was posted here, in case you missed it:

  
https://www-old.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/octave-maintainers/2009-April/012050.html

The patch I'm talking about is the attachment, not the one that I
checked in to savannah.

jwe