On 6-May-2009, Robert T. Short wrote:
| The only difference between the above and what is done now is that I
| don't currently execute the class constructor.
The change that I suggested earlier called the constructor if the
exemplar table did not have an object with the given name. I thought
you used that as a starting point for your most recent changes. My
patch was posted here, in case you missed it:
https://www-old.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/octave-maintainers/2009-April/012050.html
The patch I'm talking about is the attachment, not the one that I
checked in to savannah.
jwe