R: shared lib prefix simplification

[Marco Atzeri]

--- Gio 7/5/09, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> ha scritto:

> Da: John W. Eaton <address@hidden>
> Oggetto: R: shared lib prefix simplification
> A: "Marco Atzeri" <address@hidden>
> Cc: "John W. Eaton" <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> Data: Giovedì 7 maggio 2009, 22:29
> On  7-May-2009, Marco Atzeri
> wrote:
> 
> | --- Mar 21/4/09, Marco Atzeri <address@hidden>
> ha scritto:
> | 
> | > Da: Marco Atzeri <address@hidden>
> | > Oggetto: R: shared lib prefix simplification
> | > A: "John W. Eaton" <address@hidden>
> | > Cc: address@hidden
> | > Data: Martedì 21 Aprile 2009, 15:50
> | > 
> | > --- Mar 21/4/09, John W. Eaton <address@hidden>
> | > ha scritto:
> | > 
> | > > Da: John W. Eaton <address@hidden>
> | > > Oggetto: R: shared lib prefix simplification
> | > > A: "Marco Atzeri" <address@hidden>
> | > > Cc: address@hidden
> | > > Data: Martedì 21 Aprile 2009, 15:29
> | > > On 21-Apr-2009, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> | > > 
> | > > | do you mean :
> | > > | 
> | > > | $(SHLPRE)octinterp.$(SHLEXT)
> | > > | $(SHLLIBPRE)octinterp.$(SHLLIB)
> | > > | $(SHLBINPRE)octinterp.$(SHLBIN)
> | > > | 
> | > > | ?
> | > > 
> | > > Yes.
> | > > 
> | > > | No problem for it. 
> | > > | Do you want a new patch or are you handling
> by
> | > yourself
> | > > ?
> | > > 
> | > > It would help to have a patch.
> | > > 
> | > > Thanks,
> | > > 
> | > > jwe
> | > 
> | > OK. I will do in same days 
> | > 
> | > Marco
> | 
> | here is
> | 
> | Regards
> | Marco
> | 
> | 
> | 
> |       
> |
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> | # HG changeset patch
> | # User address@hidden
> | # Date 1241691029 -7200
> | # Node ID 9fb519c57664ab29cf11244b4046ce352074f2aa
> | # Parent  9861b3ec72a6ccef96da1c7e65a57b6298766c5a
> | Added SHLPRE for SHLEXT instead of SHLLIBPRE
> 
> I applied this changeset after fixing up the ChangeLog
> entries and
> changing all instances of SHLLIBPRE to be SHLPRE.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> jwe
> 

John,
what do you means with all instance ?
We agreed on:

 $(SHLPRE)octinterp.$(SHLEXT)
 $(SHLLIBPRE)octinterp.$(SHLLIB)
 $(SHLBINPRE)octinterp.$(SHLBIN)

so with SHLLIB we should maintain SHLIBPRE.
Or I missed some SHLEXT istance ?

Regards
Marco