octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

R: shared lib prefix simplification


From: Marco Atzeri
Subject: R: shared lib prefix simplification
Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 14:55:14 +0000 (GMT)

--- Ven 8/5/09, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> ha scritto:

> Da: John W. Eaton <address@hidden>
> Oggetto: R: shared lib prefix simplification
> A: "Marco Atzeri" <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Data: Venerdì 8 maggio 2009, 00:04
> On  7-May-2009, John W. Eaton
> wrote:
> 
> | On  7-May-2009, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> | 
> | | what do you means with all instance ?
> | | We agreed on:
> | | 
> | |  $(SHLPRE)octinterp.$(SHLEXT)
> | |  $(SHLLIBPRE)octinterp.$(SHLLIB)
> | |  $(SHLBINPRE)octinterp.$(SHLBIN)
> | | 
> | | so with SHLLIB we should maintain SHLIBPRE.
> | | Or I missed some SHLEXT istance ?
> | 
> | OK, then I probably screwed it up.
> 
> I think I've undone my incorrect changes.  Can you
> update and check to
> see whether it is now the way you expect?  Is SHLPRE
> always properly
> paired with SHLEXT, and SHLLIBPRE always properly paired
> with SHLLIB?

All look paired.

> Also, why do we set the prefixes to "" for MSVC but not
> MinGW?

I am not familiar with these two platforms, probably because
mingw is using gcc tools and style, and MS has different
expectations.

>
> Thanks,
>
> jwe

Regards
Marco



      



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]